Jun 22, 2015

Reloading: San Andreas - To a Fault

Welcome back to Reloading where we review games, movies, TV and so on. I just got a copy of Splatoon at the writing of this review (which was launch weekend). So expect that review shortly if it hasn’t already released. Until then, here’s a review of a big popular movie starring a big popular guy doing big tough things. San Andreas.


I feel like the premise of this movie was one of two things. The writers came up to the executives and said, “What if we made a disaster movie, but without the Captain Planet moral lesson of keeping the world clean because that’s been doing about a billion times?” The other suggestion might have been “What if we had a new take on Taken? Instead of Liam Neeson, it’s The Rock and instead of a daughter being kidnapped by sex-slave-traders, it’s the biggest earthquake in history and she’s semi-competent at taking take of herself?” Either way, color me surprised that San Andreas was no only good, but it was actually fun at times that most natural disaster movies have been failing at for… well many years now.


The movie stars Dwayne Johnson as Ray (not from Disaster: Day of Crisis). He’s not the retired all-knowing “father-knows-best” character, but a legitimate rescue worker (fire fighter) whose job it is to rescue people from disaster situations. So the fact he’s incredibly calm and knowledgeable of the problems and situations of the film is believable and acceptable enough for me stay in the immersion of the film. Though the fact he’s competent with every vehicle he drives does make me suspicious (helicopter, truck, bi-plane, fishing boat, etc).

He’s the father of Blake (Alexandra Daddario) who is leaving with her mother, Emma (Paula Gugino) in a divorce situation. The divorce is because of a now deceased sister that has caused Ray to close up and not want to be open with his feelings. Emma is leaving for Daniel Riddick (Ioan Gruffudd) a rich man whose job is basically to make the skyscrapers that are obliterated throughout the course of the film. There’s also a cliché scientist-team that discovers the earthquake problem and warns everyone, but they don’t do much other than what I just said, so there you go.


When the earthquake kicks off, Ray has to save Emma from a collapsing building. Meanwhile, Blake is trapped in a car in a garage. Daniel goes to find help and leaves her behind, leaving it to two the Super Limey Brothers (two British brothers she meets at Daniel’s office) to get her out. When they do, she shows off her competency and resourcefulness in survival situations. This is a reason I like this movie better than taken, because Blake actually utilizes information from her dad and uses it to keep her and her friends alive. She’s not just a rescue-object, but someone with agency and actively moves the plot forward, which is a step up from the standard problem with these films.

Ray and Emma eventually go to save Blake, but between the aftershocks, the follow-up earthquake, a collapsing building, and a tsunami, the job seems daunting and impossible. But the family eventually reunites and the films leaves us not on a message of “we need to change” but a message of “we will rebuild”. This is a refreshing turn from normal disaster films where the characters learn a lesson of changing their habits to avoid another ice age problem like in Day After Tomorrow or 2012. Hell, this feels more like Twister to be honest, but with more likeable characters.


And while the beginning really did remind me of the destruction-porn that was Man of Steel, this at least had color and context to make it more enjoyable. Not to mention you were seeing the lives of the people of San Francisco getting destroyed, the rescue workers TRYING to get them out, and the horrors the people must face (even if only shown in small glimpses) in this dark and dismal situations. After seeing what happens here, it makes me lose all respect for Man of Steel for completely ignoring that fact and having an “everyone is fine” ending like it did. It’s almost insulting to think about when in comparison to San Andreas.

This doesn’t mean San Andreas isn’t perfect. Again, it still falls to the usual clichés of the natural-disaster films, but it doesn’t get hung up on them or use ALL of them like lesser films do, which is at least a plus. And while most characters are more likable than the average movie, you still have the “asshole step-father figure” that steals the spotlight with his being a horrible human being. He gets his comeuppance eventually, but I feel like he was just tacked on and wasn’t necessary for the film to function at all.


As I said, there’s the cliché science-team that warns the world of the disaster. They basically serve as the exposition like they always do and while I feel like said trope is almost unavoidable in these films, I really wished they had found another way around it. Part of the science team is killed. They do the whole “oh god” moment when they realize everything is basically fucked. They even point out how no one listened to them in the beginning of their research. Maybe do something different like have it where they were listened to, but it didn’t matter because we’re still fucked anyway.

A part of me hates disaster films because they all come to the same points. They have a city being destroyed (or world). They have a focus on an individual family trying to get through the chaos together. They have the science team doing the exposition. But what I do like is the unrelenting force of nature filling the role of the “villain” because it can’t be fought or defeated. It can’t be outsmarted or stopped. It can only be endured and it can only be survived. It makes the movie focused more on the struggle and survival of the protagonists. This could only be made better over a longer people of time (like a TV series) to focus on the longer-lasting effects of survival, but that’s something games have been doing for a while fairly well.



I digress, San Andreas was, surprisingly enough, a fun movie worth my time and worth yours as well. I’m not a fan of the Rock, but he actually sold me as being a damn good actor this time around and the film itself was engaging, fun, and went to dark places without holding back. It’s one of the better films to come out in recent memory and you can certainly do worse than giving San Andreas a look.


That’s all for this week on Reloading. Next time, I might finally talk about video games. Who knows!? Anyway, I hope you enjoyed the article and don’t forget to like, share, comment and subscribe. There’s also a YouTube channel and other things on the blog you’re more than welcome to look because that’d be awesome. I’ll see you next time for more Reloading

No comments:

Post a Comment